On Friday 28 November 2003 11:54 am, David Olofson wrote: > On Friday 28 November 2003 15.07, Stonekeeper wrote:
[...] > However, I think the proper solution is to install things so that you > never have dependencies in the wrong direction. It makes some sense > that libs in /usr shouldn't depend on /usr/local. For the benefit of Linux newcomers like me, could someone explain the historical reasons why we even have a /usr/local directory to begin with? |) |)enji