On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 09:57, Matthias Nagorni wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Uwe Koloska wrote: > > > isn't the right thing to do to use the RDF metatadata? > > The combination of the very simple LADSPA api with something as > complicated as RDF seems a bit odd to me. I would wish if there was a > simpler solution.
The categorisation is well worth it though (and would be a really nice thing to have in AMS actually) Any objections to RDF support in AMS for the LADSPA selector? The search is a really nice feature, but sometimes I just want to see all my chorus plugins, or whatever, and searching is just too inconvenient. On the other hand, the list organized by library is a handy feature too (that lrdf-using hosts I've seen seem to lack), especially when you get a new plugin set and want to try things out. Maybe a tabbed dialog with both views? Or a mode toggle of some kind? -Dave