Robert! Could you please repost in html table format? It is hard to follow your line of thought. At least to me it looks like all your columns are scrambled?
/jens On mån, 2004-04-12 at 15:34, Dave Phillips wrote: > Hi Robert: > > Here are the Normal Transforms from Sequencer Plus Gold : > > TIME PITCH > VELOCITY SPLIT RANDOM/MISC > > Quantize Transpose Set > Pitch Pitch > Super-quantize Harmonic transpose > Adjust Quantize Start-time > Quantize duration Inversion > Crescendo Velocity Velocity > Set duration Harmonic inversion Set > note-off Duration Duration > Adjust duration Map Adjust > note-off Modulus Merge > Retrograde > Compex Track rebar > Offset > > Range rebar > Compex > > And here are the MIDI Transforms: > > TIME VALUE INS/DEL TEMPO > > Retrograde Scale Fill Accelerando > Offset Shift Crescendo Scale > Compex Invert Thin Shift > Map Elim dupes Thin > Map programs Elim dupes > > Tap tempo > > Edit regions include whole track or group of tracks, individual > measures, and individual note, and is not restricted to measure > boundaries. Alas, non-contiguous editing is not supported. > > The MIDI transforms affect MIDI messages other than note-on and > note-off. Sequencer Plus employed a user-designated track for tempo > messages, it could be edited like any other track. > > The Harmonic Xpos and Invert transforms and the Pitch randomization > employ user-defined settings in a Keysig popup. > > Sequencer Plus also includes advanced grouping features, multiple track > recording, block editing, SMPTE/MTC/MMC support, and much more. Its > drawbacks include no Undo/Redo, no graphic controller editing, and no > source code. However, it is now being given away by Voyetra. > > Best regards, > > dp > > > > > > > Robert Jonsson wrote: > > >måndagen den 12 april 2004 14.47 skrev Dave Phillips: > > > > > >>Greetings: > >> > >> I've run Master Tracks Pro under Xsteem, the MIDI I/O was fine. Ditto > >>for Sequencer Plus Gold under DOSemu. These programs are quite advanced > >>as MIDI-only sequencers, and I agree that much could be learned from > >>them. However, I get the impression that developers are responding to > >>users' requests for more audio-oriented features, so the more > >>interesting MIDI stuff is perhaps left for later addition. That's too > >>bad, but until a native Linux sequencer appears that includes the MIDI > >>features set of Sequencer Plus > >> > >> > > > >If you got the time, please do list the features you miss most. > > > >/Robert > > > > > > > > > > > >
