On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:15 , Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
> >- When I saw the collection of VST plugins that Paul Davis used >to show his VST hosting in Karlsruhe, I asked myself "My god, >do they all look that childish ?". This is just to say I terribly >dislike this eye-candy style, and given the choice between that >and a (maybe boring) set of standard toolkit sliders, I'd prefer >the latter. The ideal is somewhere in between, but certainly not >to the eye-candy side. > Amen! >- Before everything went digital, multitrack mixing desks had >lots of controls and very little space to put them in. Good >layout was absolutely essential, and most of the big name >manufacturers mastered this quite well. It's done by > > - observing elementary aesthetic rules (e.g. color > combinations), Colors must always be configurable. The percentage of color blind people is much higher than most people think. > - removing all useless clutter, > - following the logic of the application, e.g. keeping > things that are related together, > - accepting culturally defined standards, such as that > a signal flows from left to right and from top to bottom. Except in China ;-) > - using hints that are picked up unconsciously, rather > than explicit labeling. > >All of this is practically the inverse of eye-candy. > >- Confucius says: When you see a piece of audio equipment >with the word "Professional" printed on it, then it probably >isn't. > >- The typical VST plugin (talking about the serious ones) >corresponds more to a JACK application than a LADSPA plugin, >not because both have a GUI, but because of the complexity. >This is just a matter of naming. We could start calling a >JACK application a JACK 'plugin' but I'd vote against. >JAMIN is a good example of this. > >- As to LADSPA plugins, we could probably give almost all >of them a very functional and nice GUI by defining a set >of a few dozens of 'widget types'. Then there are a few >options: > >1. the plugin specifies the dimensions and positions of >all the widgets, > >2. the dimensions are standard, and the plugins specifies >the positions only, > >3. the host keeps it own database of layouts indexed by >plugin ID. > Good idea but I'd think that could get real complicated very fast. Jan