Alfons Adriaensen: >On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 07:24:59PM +0200, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen wrote: >> >> Tim Hockin: >> > >> > I know Linux people love to claim how choice is our strength, but I think >> > it's bunk. Linux needs a single GUI environment that has a lot of deep >> > flexibility >> >> Yes! I completely agree with this. > >What exactly do you mean by Linux "needing" something ? > >And how are you going to impose that single GUI environment ? >Will you take me to court when I write a new window manager. or >a widget that doesn't have your 'imprimatur' ? > >If you want your freedom to program limited, please goto >Windoze or MAC. But please do no impose your limitations on >others.
Ouch, never be sarcastic/ironic on e-mail. I completely agree with you. I though that was clear by my "Oh..." comment which you had cut away. The point was: _i_ actually want to customize everything via scheme-scripts (that is true), which Tim Hockin made (some kind of) a joke about. And by saying that I tried to express that what Tim Hockin perhaps means is ridiculous, does perfectly makes sense for other. We need to have choises/alternatives/anarchy/etc. because we are all different, etc. --