On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 15:56, Pete Bessman wrote: > At Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:15:30 -0400, > Jesse Chappell wrote: > > > > In fact the sliderbutton really just seems to lack the visual > > indication of "sliderness", and i think adding it as Dave suggested > > would be a good addition (or make a new widget). > > I have no idea what you mean by lacking a visual indication of > sliderness. > > None of this is the point of the sliderbutton. I tend to think that > representing discrete numerical quantities (i.e. Channels 1 to 16) is > best done with the roman alphabet. > > For the sliderbutton in graphical form with variable precision, check > the fansliders.
Fair enough. > Sorry about the flicker, it doesn't happen when > dragging to the right or down; It doesn't flicker, but the rightmost edge is really jumpy and glitchy looking. Maybe add a bit of a horizontal threshold for resizing so it doesn't look so glitchy? -DR-