Dave Robillard: > On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 07:48, martin rumori wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:03:18 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: >> > > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to leave the >> > > mapping open for the user to modify? >> > >> > I would say so yes, its possible that an OSC schema spe will be >> > standardised at soem point that would make it easier. >> >> not to mention the microtone-capabilities of your osc sequencer and >> the sophisticated envelope control functions, which are hard to cover >> with pure midi... :-)) > > Imagine a sequencer where, instead of little straight bars representing > notes, the 'piano roll' just allowed you to draw a line to represent > frequency.. with any angle, straight or curved (bezier), etc. Wow.. > > Control could be like that too, with overlay and everything, but having > that for pitch would be amazing.. has something like this ever been done > before? >
You can draw lines to represent pitch (and everything else) in Radium, but its not a piano-roll though. http://www.notam02.no/radium/ (latest linux-(not-finished)-version: http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/)
