Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there any known issues with the code that the kernel guys might > bring up? Seems like it has been stable for a while. The only thing I > notices was that the indentation doesn't follow the recommended kernel > style.
It meets the recommendations I know about. If you point out specific problems, I'll fix them. > I found your original RFC post to the LSM mailing list, I was thinking > of including a pointer to that, as everything in there still seems to > apply. Good idea. > Also, I assume you are not referring to sourceforge CVS, because I > looked and there aren't any Kconfig patches. Can you commit this to SF > CVS so I can check it out? That was a working directory. I never committed it because I haven't figured out a good way to maintain the patches over successive kernel versions. It doesn't belong in CVS. When I tried it with 2.6.8.1, the patch failed to apply. > Anyway let me know when you have a patch you are comfortable submitting > for inclusion in the kernel and I will go ahead and post it. I am working up a new patch for 2.6.8.1 and testing it today. I'll send you a copy as soon as it is clean. -- joq