On Tue, 2005-12-04 at 20:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > dssi needs jacktransport awareness.
I agree very much.. the question is whether to add some sort of explicit transport support, or just a standard set of ports that convey the necessary information. If it would only take a port or two to get the req'd information, I'm for that approach, particularly since it's backwards-to-LADSPA compatible. Might not be sufficient though? Should we take it to the DSSI list? -DR-
