I think that would be a non-standard extension of the current practice and
wouldn't be understood by current parsers.
Taybin
-----Original Message-----
From: Jens M Andreasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 25, 2005 3:16 AM
To:
The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List
<linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:03 +0100, Nick Dowell wrote:
> Good idea.
>
> reverse - domain name type addresses are used quite widely now, in Java
> for example and in all apple's latest stuff.
>
> eg "uk.org.plugin.analogueOsc"
>
Can we have a unique divider between the domain and product?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.. are in java both represented as
com.example.bar.foo
Having instead, say
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.. would resolve this (minor) issue.
> combined with a version number, you can correctly identify plugins no
> matter their filename..
>
> -n
>
> On 20 May 2005, at 14:19, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > Or, we could use a system thats been demonstrated to work really
> > well...
> > http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
>
--
