On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 21:41 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 21:35, Jussi Laako wrote: > > You can derive a new class from the template and overload the [] > > operator to perform exactly same as in C. After compilation the > > result is the same no matter if the template or C array is used. > > Are you sure this is still true in the gcc world, after they changed > vector from an array to a real class in gcc 3.3 or whenever it was?
Abovementioned template is not based on STL... About the STL; there are number of different implementations of std::vector<> in different C++ RTLs, so one cannot expect anything specific except the interface from it. It may, or may not, be slow, but it's not C++'s fault. -- Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
