I believe the C++ standard specifies that vector<> uses contigous memory and that &v[0] returns a valid pointer to an array.
Taybin -----Original Message----- From: Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jun 8, 2005 4:41 PM To: linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu Cc: Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ot] [rant] gcc, you let me down one time too many On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 21:35, Jussi Laako wrote: > You can derive a new class from the template and overload the [] > operator to perform exactly same as in C. After compilation the > result is the same no matter if the template or C array is used. Are you sure this is still true in the gcc world, after they changed vector from an array to a real class in gcc 3.3 or whenever it was? Chris
