On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:54:01 +0200 fons adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strange... If you would program a timer using the info available from > jackd's DLL, it would never generate its interrupt before the HW is > ready (i.e. has at least a period available). It would actually trigger > just after the interrupt it is derived from (the small average latency > that is not compensated). So I wonder what problem CoreAudio has with > this. Maybe the timers used aren't precise enough for this.. I don't know. Anyone? Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://affenbande.org/~tapas/
