On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > I suppose to make everyone happy this should be runtime configurable. > > Incorporating which would be quite a task :) > > no, to make everyone happy we need the High Res Timer patch. that avoids > the stupidity of a fixed HZ, which is so early '90s that its > embarrassing.
Wow, I did not know what you meant by this, but apparently Windows has had a dynamic timer tick since at least Windows 98. Embarrassing indeed. Lee