On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:37 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:18 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 23:10 +0200, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen wrote: > > > I wonder why /dev/rtc isn't used more than it is now. > > > > Because sleep/wakeup, poll, etc are much nicer interfaces than /dev/rtc. > > any sane programmer will use slee/wakeup, poll etc. with /dev/rtc :) >
Sorry, what i meant to say was, you can use usleep() for timing, rather than polling on the RTC. Lee
