On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 19:19 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:25 -0600, Jan Depner wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:23 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 06:14 +0000, peter wrote: > > > > i have a question for you though, would you take widespread copyright > > > > infringement over pervasive DRM (and it's associated outcomes)? > > > > > > > > > > This is a false dichotomy. > > > > > > > it's a moot question, we're gonna get DRM. > > > > > > I'm not worried - I think DRM will fail in the marketplace. > > > > > > > Damn, Lee, we're agreeing on everything except real-time. This is > > not normal for us ;-) > > > > I should have said, I think onerous DRM will fail in the marketplace. I > see no reason why reasonable DRM like Apple's system that lets you > CHOOSE whether to buy songs from Itunes or fill it with illegal MP3s > should fail.
so in other words, we now agree on the outcome, just not the justification. pete.