On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 19:56 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > so you say that i should not htonl the floats i copy from my net > buffer > to the jack-port ? > i doubt, this is a great performance impact. >
These were just suggestions... of course the performance impact is small. But when a code path will be called on every sample then even a 0.01% speedup is worthwhile. > when i change the packet format next time, i could change that to byte > swap on a PPC. but considering that PPCs are generally slower than x86 > nowadays, this would create more cpu load on a jack-network. > > i am puzzled. did anybody actually test it ? > well at least there is some netjack thread now :/ > Well, you did post your announcement to a development list - if you only wanted testers you should have only sent to LAU ;-) Lee
