On 4/3/06, carmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > encouraging growth in an area by writing code. Now I just wish we had > > a qt/gtk unification > > i dont think wishing one of them will go away is going to work. it seems in > tech spaces, there are always 2 player in a given field which benefit from > the borrowing/uneupmanship that goes on: google/yahoo, apple/microsoft, > amd/intel, gtk/qt, ie/firefox, vhs/beta->dvd+r/dvd-r->hd-dvd/bluray, etc. if > you want to start talking about duplicated efforts, tell me why do > MHWaveEdit, Audacity, Rezound, Sweep, GnuSound, Snd, Glame, and Waveforge, > Wavesurfer, and Xsox all exist? (meanwhile, theres no graphical OSC sequencer > available in GTK/QT, and the only nondestructive wave editor ive seen > (protux) seems abandoned and doesnt even compile (despite the concept haven > proven itself in the win32 world with aps like wavelab's multichannel mode, > ableton live, samplitude, pyramix..) anyways, i think people should be > encouraged, but gently told that theyre reinventing a wheel when theres a > warehouse of them sitting by.
I'm with you there. > > > but it would be nice to not have to translate between the two! > > what do you mean? youre constantly porting stuff back and forth between gtk > and I've ported some widgets, yes, but this was more light commentary. qt to satisfy some sick craving? :) > You may be getting somewhere with that... -- Patrick Kidd Stinson http://www.patrickkidd.com/ http://pkaudio.sourceforge.net/ http://pksampler.sourceforge.net/
