[Steve Harris] >On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:26:27 -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: >> I wonder why people include the protocol though? Using a java style >> reverse DNS would have worked just fine: >> >> org.ladspa.ontology would have made sense too. > >Heh, that's a whole long argument. In brief: I should have put a copy of >the ontology there (I meant to, just never got round to it), and that >means that if/when a human finds a ladspa rdf file in the wild, they can >type it in the namespace and find a copy of the ontology (with human >readable notes in it) that explains what it is.
Which naïve me was expecting to find. A LADSPA ontology ... I love the idea. >If you use a tag: URI, or something else unresolvable then you dont have >the option to look it up, ever. But, if you use HTTP then you can put >something there, should you want to. Please don't take it off your list of things to do. Cheers, Tim
