On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:19:42PM +0200, Lars Luthman wrote: > > Overall I think this is a much better approach than LADSPA 1.x, it has > > usable identifiers, a clear route for extensions without compatibility > > problems and each plugin is quite a lot simpler. > > What type of extensions are you talking about here, and what is the > clear route?
Extensions to the metadata, eg. port groups, new kinds of port (assuming they can still be float *s), additional hints etc. The clear route is the RDF namespacing mechanism, if someone wants to try a new extension they can just start using it under thier own namespace, then it can be added to the core spec if it's popular. - Steve