> I'm going to assume this is a shot at me for rather obvious reasons. No, I was more thinking in Phil Frost's contribution to this discussion (contribution that I find very interesting and pertinent, but as a musician I am not interested in LADSPA becoming another low level LEGO api to build modular synths, there are already some good solutions to that problem).
> *sigh* someone just had to do it, didn't they? GUIs appeared in the thread long before my post. > LAD_S_PA2 is not going to have GUIs. http://dssi.sf.net. Enjoy. I am well aware of that. Thanks for the pointer, anyway. http://flam.sf.net But still there are some parts of LADSPA that have to provide information for effective (auto)building of GUIs. > Now can we please have a productive discussion about fixing very real > problems with LADSPA without /that/ *&%$% topic ruining everything, yet > again, thanks? My apologies for bothering you. I will just return silently to my playground and let the real men do the real stuff. Peace, Luis
