On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 23:58 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > Ok, some thoughts about the headerfile: [snip] > after reading this i do not see why a new ladspa header is required. > there are barely any changes in 2. i think this is going to become more > confusing than helpful, especially since it will not be possible to load > ladspa 1+2 plugins in the same host with ease (yes, people do not like > to fix orphaned code and recompile binaries, imagine!).
You are completely missing the entire point of LADSPA2. All the unecessary data has been removed from the header file (ie the plugin code). Look at the example plugin's code, it will be painfully obvious what the advantage is. -DR-
