On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:04 +0200, Leonard "paniq" Ritter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > if it never refuses then its ok with me ;) > > > > It's certainly allowed to refuse, it would just be bad manners, unless the > > host has ignored the required features list. > > so required features have to be checked on both sides. isn't that > redundant?
The plugin (obviously) needs to check the features anyway, since it needs to (or may want to) use them. Can't use something if you don't even know if it's there. -DR-