On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:30 -0700, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: > I think the argument about S is valid enough though, but not a good enough > argument to change a name we all have learned and love(?). As an > alternative, we can change the meaning of s into something else, like > Super, Second, Sophisticated, System, Steve, Sourcecode, Syntax, > Structure, Success, Superb, Superior. To name a few, well, I'm sure there > are better alternatives.
What about SHAG: Steve Harris' Audio Gear -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org
