On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:57:54 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Dave Robillard wrote: > > > >This is a good point. The POD line is _VERY_ well known, and given that > >plugins can be effects or guitar amp models etc (ie the domain is > >similar) I wouldn't be surprised if Line6's lawyers had something to say > >about it once they find out. > > > >-DR- > > > > > > OPOD - Open POD > > The file extensions could be .opd
I had a very very similar idea: OpenPOD, OPOD being a non-cannonical abbreviation, extension .opod. By my own metric is level 3/0 crapness :) There are a bunch of openpod/oped things, none of them are relevant though (I expexted a bunch of mp3 player related stuff, but no). Openpod.org is a free software news site. Because it's $word$word we'd have to go for a slightly crap TLD. I think I like it, but it's not ultra-stellar-fantastic. Before anyone suggests it, FreePod is a piece of windows malware amongst other things :) - Steve
