On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 22:39 +0100, pete wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 12:04 +0100, peter wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 07:07 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:55 +0200, Esben Stien wrote: > >>> > >>>> ZAP Audio Plugins > >>>> > >>> I like this one, especially if the R. Crumb reference is intentional > >>> > >>> > >> hmm ZAP. not only the least offensive recursive acronym i've seen but > >> it's > >> > > > > Why was 'peep' offensive? urbandictionary was of no help. > different kind of offensive. recursive acro's are often contrived and > stretched to fit. > peep isn't SO bad and it's even palindromic if you go in for that sort of > thing but ZAP > just seems to have a lot going for it where peep seems a bit laboured.
I don't like ZAP at all. Sounds silly and childish. </my2cents> -DR-