On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 23:53 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Dave Robillard wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 17:43 +0200, Luis Garrido wrote: > >>> LinuxSampler is not free software or open source software. > >>> > >> (sigh, must we, really?) > >> > >> It depends on who you choose to side with. > > It's just using a modified GPL License which isn't clearly labelled as > such.
According to this URL http://cvs.linuxsampler.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxsampler/src/Sampler.cpp?rev=1.28&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup I have permission to use that particular file under the GPL, or (at my option) any later version. Looking through a few other files and I see I have the same permissions for those. Seems to be open source *and* free software *and* released under the GPL *and* free-as-in-beer. *shrug* Bob -- Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
