On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:52:15PM +0000, carmen wrote: > > you hope not what? it just seems like Turtle should be developers choice, > > and the format in the .bundle should be more standard - even Firefox can > > parse RDF/XML out of the box. the vast majority of the cool tools like > > Fresnel/Protoge that some develoeprs might want to edit their schemas in, > > don't support Turtle as well, AFAIK.. > > my main issue is the only RDF toolkit in Portage didnt properly include > Turtle parsing. which means theres an even slimmer chance of such things > existing in Debian, Fedora, etc. now i must investigate why this is the > case.. on top of that, a lot of the ideas wrt interactive documentation (eg > wiki-style annotations of what ports actually do, user presets, etc) on the > web would be easier since RDF/XML is readily embeddable into XHTML. throwing > a 'raptor blahblah.ttl > blahblah.xml' in a SConstruct is praobly easier than > having to continually think about it on the server side (eg in PHP) or in > JavaScript..
You can't "easily" embed RDF/XML into XHTML, you can use RDF/A or GRDDL, but that's different. You can apply the same conversion argument just as well the other way round. I have some PHP scripts that conneg LV2 turtle files into HTML (still very primitive) or RDF/XML as required, it's not exactly hard. - Steve
