On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 12:08 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 09:02:31 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > Mmm. For what it's worth, I write mostly C++ but have no problem > > > with using the libsndfile C API. > > > > Most people who really know C++ know enough to be comfortable > > with pure C. I'm pretty sure you fall into this category. > > > > However, I do get emails from some of the more clueless Windiots > > complaining that libsndfile is written in old-fashioned C instead > > of nice shiny modern C++. IMNSHO these people should not be allowed > > anywhere near a language as complex, subtle, and unforgiving as > > C++ (or for that matter as unforgiving as C). > > Heh, I get that from UNIX people too though, I always assumed they were > trying to wind me up...
But it _would_ be nice to have template functors as callbacks in liblo, so you wouldn't have to write static wrappers all the time. =) -- Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part