On Saturday 27 January 2007 06:47, Loki Davison wrote: > On 1/27/07, Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been converting my old VST plugins over to LADSPA and have come > > across something in the api which I really miss - the inability separate > > the algorithmic to the displayed value of a parameter. > > I'm finding this inability is leading to non-ideal programming habits. > > why are you coding new stuff for a depreciated system? Why not LV2?
And why should you code for a plugin standard that nothing supports? Besides, is LV2 even finished? Suggesting that LADSPA is deprecated is a bit of a stretch. It may not be perfect, but it's well supported. /Robert > It's extensible so if anything is missing you can add it. > http://lv2plug.in/ > > Loki > > p.s. > > hiking in yunnan / tibet border area is pretty awesome!
