On Thursday 14 December 2006 19:44, Eric Paris wrote:
> Would you mind explaining why we had to drop the chuck from the original
> patch to auditfilter.c which had:

After looking at the message, it is a summary message rather than individual 
messages for each change. So, to add the key field which may be different for 
each rule that contains that path would involve a larger re-write so. I  
wasn't sure that its worth it.

-Steve

--
Linux-audit mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to