On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Paul Moore wrote:

> I've looked over patches #7, #8, and #9 and they look okay to me, but 
> I'm not tagging them 'Reviewed-by' because they go beyond areas of the 
> kernel that I feel comfortable reviewing at this point.

Indeed, deep audit patches need to be acked by the likes of Al Viro (cc'd, 
who possibly should also be added to the MAINTAINERS entry for audit).


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to