[To audit maintainers] On 01/23/2014 11:18 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:13:14AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:--- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ enum { /* distinguish syscall tables */ #define __AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT 0x80000000 #define __AUDIT_ARCH_LE 0x40000000 +#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64 (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) +#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64EB (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT) #define AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA (EM_ALPHA|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARM (EM_ARM|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB (EM_ARM) diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 79383d3..3aae602 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ config AUDITconfig AUDITSYSCALL bool "Enable system-call auditing support" - depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT)) + depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT) || ARM64)The usual comment for such changes: could you please clean this up and just use something like "depends on HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL"?
Do you agree to this change? If so, I can create a patch, but have some concerns: 1) I can't verify it on other architectures than (arm &) arm64. 2) Some architectures (microblaze, mips, openrisc) are not listed here, but their ptrace.c have a call to audit_syscall_entry/exit(). (audit_syscall_entry/exit are null if !AUDITSYSCALL, though) So I'm afraid that the change might break someone's assumption. Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
