On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 11:30 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 11:13 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/05/13, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On 14/05/10, Eric Paris wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 20:27 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > > Generate and assign a serial number per namespace instance since boot.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Use a serial number per namespace (unique across one boot of one 
> > > > > kernel)
> > > > > instead of the inode number (which is claimed to have had the right 
> > > > > to change
> > > > > reserved and is not necessarily unique if there is more than one proc 
> > > > > fs) to
> > > > > uniquely identify it per kernel boot.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * ns_serial - compute a serial number for the namespace
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Compute a serial number for the namespace to uniquely identify it 
> > > > > in
> > > > > + * audit records.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +unsigned long long ns_serial(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +     static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(serial_lock);
> > > > > +     static unsigned long long serial = 4; /* reserved for IPC, UTS, 
> > > > > user, PID */
> > > > > +     unsigned long flags;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     spin_lock_irqsave(&serial_lock, flags);
> > > > > +     ++serial;
> > > > > +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial_lock, flags);
> > > > > +     BUG_ON(!serial);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     return serial;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static inline struct nsproxy *create_nsproxy(void)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >       struct nsproxy *nsproxy;
> > > > 
> > > > atomic64_t instead of doing it yourself?
> > > 
> > > I'm willing to switch to atomic64_*.  Thanks for pointing out its
> > > existence.
> > 
> > Same would then go for using atomic_t in audit_serial().
> 
> Yup, moving to an atomic in audit_serial() looks like a good idea to me.

Talking with steve on irc, neither of us see a need for the double
increment quirk if the serial wraps back to 0.  Nothing wrong with 0, it
is a number.

-Eric

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to