On Friday, July 17, 2015 12:18:27 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/07/16, Eric Paris wrote: > > I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other > > patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long > > standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we > > really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated > > feature addition. But it ain't my tree :) > > So maybe even fixing this before applying the audit exe stuff has > merit...
No, let's get the exe filter stuff in now just so I can get all you guys off my back about it :) The refcnt stuff is almost surely going to get messy and I would just assume not deal with that right now since it appears to be working. We have other stuff we need to fix first. -- paul moore security @ redhat -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
