On Monday, August 10, 2015 12:53:54 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/10, Paul Moore wrote: > > I'm still not convinced that we need to merge exe child filtering patch so > > I'm not going to apply this, or your v10 patch, at this point in time. > > If you want to hold on to the code in case you and/or Steve think you can > > convince me at a later date, you might as well merge this fixup patch > > into the v10 patch. > > I fixed the known problems and reposted it for reference and public > archive so that it wasn't buried privately in my tree.
No problem, that's smart. I just wanted to respond so that there wasn't any confusion about the status of this patch; I figure everybody who takes the time to post a patch deserves a response, even if it is "no thanks". > Aside from the need for the child filtering patch, do the RCU treatments > here look reasonable? Yep, it looks reasonable to me. -- paul moore security @ redhat -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
