On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:35 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 09:40:34 AM Saurabh Sengar wrote: >> > variavle rc in not required as it is just used for unchanged for return, >> > and return is always 0 in the function. > [] >> Thanks, applied with some spelling corrections to the description. > > As the return value is never actually tested, > it seems better to make it a void function,
Agreed, I did just that yesterday. * https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2015-October/msg00125.html -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit