On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 02:31:16 -0400
> Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Audit link denied events were being unexpectedly produced in a
>> disjoint way when audit was disabled, and when they were expected,
>> there were duplicate PATH records. This patchset addresses both
>> issues for symlinks and hardlinks.
>>
>> This was introduced with
>> commit b24a30a7305418ff138ff51776fc555ec57c011a
>> ("audit: fix event coverage of AUDIT_ANOM_LINK")
>> commit a51d9eaa41866ab6b4b6ecad7b621f8b66ece0dc
>> ("fs: add link restriction audit reporting")
>>
>> Here are the resulting events:
>>
>> symlink:
>> type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(03/12/2018 02:21:49.578:310) :
>> proctitle=ls ./my-passwd type=PATH msg=audit(03/12/2018
>> 02:21:49.578:310) : item=1 name=/tmp/ inode=13529 dev=00:27
>> mode=dir,sticky,777 ouid=root ogid=root rdev=00:00
>> obj=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 nametype=PARENT cap_fp=none
>> cap_fi=none cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0 type=PATH msg=audit(03/12/2018
>> 02:21:49.578:310) : item=0 name=./my-passwd inode=17090 dev=00:27
>> mode=link,777 ouid=rgb ogid=rgb rdev=00:00
>> obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 nametype=NORMAL cap_fp=none
>> cap_fi=none cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0 type=CWD msg=audit(03/12/2018
>> 02:21:49.578:310) : cwd=/tmp type=SYSCALL msg=audit(03/12/2018
>> 02:21:49.578:310) : arch=x86_64 syscall=stat success=no
>> exit=EACCES(Permission denied) a0=0x7ffd79950dda a1=0x563f658a03c8
>> a2=0x563f658a03c8 a3=0x79950d00 items=2 ppid=552 pid=629 auid=root
>> uid=root gid=root euid=root suid=root fsuid=root egid=root sgid=root
>> fsgid=root tty=ttyS0 ses=1 comm=ls exe=/usr/bin/ls
>> subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
>> type=ANOM_LINK msg=audit(03/12/2018 02:21:49.578:310) :
>> op=follow_link ppid=552 pid=629 auid=root uid=root gid=root euid=root
>> suid=root fsuid=root egid=root sgid=root fsgid=root tty=ttyS0 ses=1
>> comm=ls exe=/usr/bin/ls
>
> So, if we now only emit the ANOM_LINK event when audit is enabled, we
> should get rid of all the duplicate information in that record. The
> SYSCALL record has all that information.
As discussed previously, I'm not going to merge any patches which
remove fields from existing records.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
