On Thursday, May 31, 2018 6:21:20 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2018-05-31 17:29, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Thursday, May 31, 2018 4:23:09 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > The AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE name is vague and misleading due to not > > > describing > > > where or when the filter is applied and obsolete due to its available > > > filter fields having been expanded. > > > > > > Userspace has already renamed it from AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE to > > > AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE without checking if it already exists. > > > > Historically speaking, this is not why it is the way it is. But I think > > it > > doesn't mean that you cannot do something like this: > > > > #define AUDIT_FILTER_EXCLUDE AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE > > I was originally hoping to do that, but that then causes a build error > on any previous version of audit userspace.
I cannot reproduce this. What error did you get? What version of gcc? Thanks, -Steve -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit