The parameters passed to this logging function are all provided by
a privileged user and therefore we can call audit_log_string()
rather than audit_log_untrustedstring().

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 8bbc18eb07eb..1d00db19d167 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static void ima_log_string_op(struct audit_buffer *ab, char 
*key, char *value,
                audit_log_format(ab, "%s<", key);
        else
                audit_log_format(ab, "%s=", key);
-       audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, value);
+       audit_log_string(ab, value);
        audit_log_format(ab, " ");
 }
 static void ima_log_string(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key, char *value)
-- 
2.13.6

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to