Integrity measurement may filter on security module information
and needs to be clear in the case of multiple active security
modules which applies. Provide a boot option ima_rules_lsm= to
allow the user to specify an active securty module to apply
filters to. If not specified, use the first registered module
that supports the audit_rule_match() LSM hook. Allow the user
to specify in the IMA policy an lsm= option to specify the
security module to use for a particular rule.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <ca...@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integr...@vger.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy |  8 +++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c  | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy 
b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
index e35263f97fc1..a7943d40466f 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Description:
                        base:   [[func=] [mask=] [fsmagic=] [fsuuid=] [uid=]
                                [euid=] [fowner=] [fsname=]]
                        lsm:    [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=]
-                                [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]]
+                                [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=] [lsm=]]
                        option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio]
                                [appraise_flag=] [keyrings=]
                  base:
@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ Description:
 
                        measure subj_user=_ func=FILE_CHECK mask=MAY_READ
 
+               It is possible to explicitly specify which security
+               module a rule applies to using lsm=.  If the security
+               modules specified is not active on the system the rule
+               will be rejected.  If lsm= is not specified the first
+               security module registered on the system will be assumed.
+
                Example of measure rules using alternate PCRs::
 
                        measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK pcr=4
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 8002683003e6..de72b719c90c 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
                void *rules[LSMBLOB_ENTRIES]; /* LSM file metadata specific */
                char *args_p;   /* audit value */
                int type;       /* audit type */
+               int which_lsm; /* which of the rules to use */
        } lsm[MAX_LSM_RULES];
        char *fsname;
        struct ima_rule_opt_list *keyrings; /* Measure keys added to these 
keyrings */
@@ -90,17 +91,15 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 
 /**
  * ima_lsm_isset - Is a rule set for any of the active security modules
- * @rules: The set of IMA rules to check
+ * @entry: the rule entry to examine
+ * @lsm_rule: the specific rule type in question
  *
- * If a rule is set for any LSM return true, otherwise return false.
+ * If a rule is set return true, otherwise return false.
  */
-static inline bool ima_lsm_isset(void *rules[])
+static inline bool ima_lsm_isset(struct ima_rule_entry *entry, int lsm_rule)
 {
-       int i;
-
-       for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++)
-               if (rules[i])
-                       return true;
+       if (entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules[entry->lsm[lsm_rule].which_lsm])
+               return true;
        return false;
 }
 
@@ -273,6 +272,20 @@ static int __init default_appraise_policy_setup(char *str)
 }
 __setup("ima_appraise_tcb", default_appraise_policy_setup);
 
+static int ima_rule_lsm __ro_after_init;
+
+static int __init ima_rule_lsm_init(char *str)
+{
+       ima_rule_lsm = lsm_name_to_slot(str);
+       if (ima_rule_lsm < 0) {
+               ima_rule_lsm = 0;
+               pr_err("rule lsm \"%s\" not registered", str);
+       }
+
+       return 1;
+}
+__setup("ima_rule_lsm=", ima_rule_lsm_init);
+
 static struct ima_rule_opt_list *ima_alloc_rule_opt_list(const substring_t 
*src)
 {
        struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list;
@@ -346,7 +359,8 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 
        for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
                for (r = 0; r < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; r++)
-                       ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rules[r]);
+                       if (entry->lsm[i].rules[r])
+                               ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rules[r]);
                kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
        }
 }
@@ -398,7 +412,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct 
ima_rule_entry *entry)
                ima_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal,
                                     nentry->lsm[i].args_p,
                                     &nentry->lsm[i].rules[0]);
-               if (!ima_lsm_isset(nentry->lsm[i].rules))
+               if (!ima_lsm_isset(nentry, i))
                        pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n",
                                nentry->lsm[i].args_p);
        }
@@ -563,7 +577,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, 
struct inode *inode,
                int rc = 0;
                u32 osid;
 
-               if (!ima_lsm_isset(rule->lsm[i].rules)) {
+               if (!ima_lsm_isset(rule, i)) {
                        if (!rule->lsm[i].args_p)
                                continue;
                        else
@@ -925,6 +939,7 @@ enum {
        Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt,
        Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag,
        Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_keyrings,
+       Opt_lsm,
        Opt_err
 };
 
@@ -962,6 +977,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = {
        {Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"},
        {Opt_template, "template=%s"},
        {Opt_keyrings, "keyrings=%s"},
+       {Opt_lsm, "lsm=%s"},
        {Opt_err, NULL}
 };
 
@@ -970,7 +986,7 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
 {
        int result;
 
-       if (ima_lsm_isset(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules))
+       if (ima_lsm_isset(entry, lsm_rule))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p = match_strdup(args);
@@ -981,7 +997,7 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
        result = ima_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type, Audit_equal,
                                      entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p,
                                      &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules[0]);
-       if (!ima_lsm_isset(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rules)) {
+       if (!ima_lsm_isset(entry, lsm_rule)) {
                pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n",
                        entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p);
 
@@ -1488,6 +1504,19 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct 
ima_rule_entry *entry)
                                                 &(template_desc->num_fields));
                        entry->template = template_desc;
                        break;
+               case Opt_lsm:
+                       result = lsm_name_to_slot(args[0].from);
+                       if (result == LSMBLOB_INVALID) {
+                               int i;
+
+                               for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++)
+                                       entry->lsm[i].args_p = NULL;
+                               result = -EINVAL;
+                               break;
+                       }
+                       entry->lsm->which_lsm = result;
+                       result = 0;
+                       break;
                case Opt_err:
                        ima_log_string(ab, "UNKNOWN", p);
                        result = -EINVAL;
@@ -1524,6 +1553,7 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
        struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
        ssize_t result, len;
        int audit_info = 0;
+       int i;
 
        p = strsep(&rule, "\n");
        len = strlen(p) + 1;
@@ -1541,6 +1571,9 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
 
+       for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++)
+               entry->lsm[i].which_lsm = ima_rule_lsm;
+
        result = ima_parse_rule(p, entry);
        if (result) {
                ima_free_rule(entry);
@@ -1751,7 +1784,7 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
        }
 
        for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
-               if (ima_lsm_isset(entry->lsm[i].rules)) {
+               if (ima_lsm_isset(entry, i)) {
                        switch (i) {
                        case LSM_OBJ_USER:
                                seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_obj_user),
@@ -1793,6 +1826,9 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
                seq_puts(m, "appraise_flag=check_blacklist ");
        if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO)
                seq_puts(m, "permit_directio ");
+       if (entry->lsm->which_lsm >= 0)
+               seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_lsm),
+                          lsm_slot_to_name(entry->lsm->which_lsm));
        rcu_read_unlock();
        seq_puts(m, "\n");
        return 0;
-- 
2.25.4

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to