The IMA interfaces ima_get_action() and ima_match_policy()
call LSM functions that use lsmblobs. Change the IMA functions
to pass the lsmblob to be compatible with the LSM functions.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johan...@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <s...@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <ca...@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-integr...@vger.kernel.org
To: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h          |  6 ++---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c      |  6 ++---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c |  5 ++--
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c     | 36 +++++++++++----------------
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c   | 17 ++++++-------
 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 55f3bd4f0b01..a6b59fcaf62a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static inline void ima_process_queued_keys(void) {}
 
 /* LIM API function definitions */
 int ima_get_action(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
-                  const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask,
+                  const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, int mask,
                   enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr,
                   struct ima_template_desc **template_desc,
                   const char *func_data);
@@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char 
**pathbuf, char *filename);
 
 /* IMA policy related functions */
 int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
-                    const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func,
-                    int mask, int flags, int *pcr,
+                    const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob,
+                    enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr,
                     struct ima_template_desc **template_desc,
                     const char *func_data);
 void ima_init_policy(void);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
index d8e321cc6936..691f68d478f1 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned 
char *filename,
  * @mnt_userns:        user namespace of the mount the inode was found from
  * @inode: pointer to the inode associated with the object being validated
  * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate
- * @secid: secid of the task being validated
+ * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated
  * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC,
  *        MAY_APPEND)
  * @func: caller identifier
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned 
char *filename,
  *
  */
 int ima_get_action(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
-                  const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask,
+                  const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, int mask,
                   enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr,
                   struct ima_template_desc **template_desc,
                   const char *func_data)
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ int ima_get_action(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, 
struct inode *inode,
 
        flags &= ima_policy_flag;
 
-       return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, cred, secid, func, mask,
+       return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, cred, blob, func, mask,
                                flags, pcr, template_desc, func_data);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index e3d903d6e5e7..de50ed4df878 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -77,10 +77,9 @@ int ima_must_appraise(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, 
struct inode *inode,
                return 0;
 
        security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
-       /* scaffolding the .secid[0] */
        return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
-                               blob.secid[0], func, mask,
-                               IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+                               &blob, func, mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH,
+                               NULL, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 static int ima_fix_xattr(struct dentry *dentry,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index de084954d0b9..2bcbfb577860 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -194,8 +194,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file)
 }
 
 static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
-                              u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask,
-                              enum ima_hooks func)
+                              struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size,
+                              int mask, enum ima_hooks func)
 {
        struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
        struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL;
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const 
struct cred *cred,
         * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy.
         * Included is the appraise submask.
         */
-       action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(file), inode, cred, secid,
+       action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(file), inode, cred, blob,
                                mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc, NULL);
        violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) &&
                           (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
@@ -392,8 +392,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 
        if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) {
                security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
-               /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */
-               return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0],
+               return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob,
                                           NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK);
        }
 
@@ -434,7 +433,7 @@ int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned 
long prot)
        inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
        /* scaffolding */
        action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(vma->vm_file), inode,
-                               current_cred(), blob.secid[0], MAY_EXEC,
+                               current_cred(), &blob, MAY_EXEC,
                                MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, NULL);
 
        /* Is the mmap'ed file in policy? */
@@ -473,16 +472,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
        struct lsmblob blob;
 
        security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
-       /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
-       ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0],
-                                 NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
+       ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0,
+                                 MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
        security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob);
-       /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
-       return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0],
-                                  NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK);
+       return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0,
+                                  MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -500,8 +497,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
        struct lsmblob blob;
 
        security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
-       /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
-       return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0,
+       return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0,
                                   mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC |
                                           MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK);
 }
@@ -698,9 +694,8 @@ int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum 
kernel_read_file_id read_id,
        /* Read entire file for all partial reads. */
        func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK;
        security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
-       /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */
-       return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL,
-                                  0, MAY_READ, func);
+       return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0,
+                                  MAY_READ, func);
 }
 
 const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = {
@@ -742,9 +737,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t 
size,
 
        func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK;
        security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
-       /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */
-       return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf,
-                                  size, MAY_READ, func);
+       return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size,
+                                  MAY_READ, func);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -889,7 +883,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace 
*mnt_userns,
                security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob);
                /* scaffolding */
                action = ima_get_action(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(),
-                                       blob.secid[0], 0, func, &pcr, &template,
+                                       &blob, 0, func, &pcr, &template,
                                        func_data);
                if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE))
                        return;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 6d112ec89c1b..a2b8c0ad8b74 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
  * @mnt_userns:        user namespace of the mount the inode was found from
  * @inode: a pointer to an inode
  * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation
- * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated
+ * @blob: the lsm data of the task to be validated
  * @func: LIM hook identifier
  * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC)
  * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL
@@ -558,8 +558,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
 static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
                            struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
                            struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
-                           u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
-                           const char *func_data)
+                           struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func,
+                           int mask, const char *func_data)
 {
        int i;
 
@@ -628,8 +628,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
                case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
                case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
                case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
-                       lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, secid);
-                       rc = ima_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata, rule->lsm[i].type,
+                       rc = ima_filter_rule_match(blob, rule->lsm[i].type,
                                                   Audit_equal,
                                                   rule->lsm[i].rule);
                        break;
@@ -673,7 +672,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum 
ima_hooks func)
  * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made
  * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is
  *        being made
- * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated
+ * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated
  * @func: IMA hook identifier
  * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC)
  * @pcr: set the pcr to extend
@@ -688,8 +687,8 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum 
ima_hooks func)
  * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate.
  */
 int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
-                    const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func,
-                    int mask, int flags, int *pcr,
+                    const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob,
+                    enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr,
                     struct ima_template_desc **template_desc,
                     const char *func_data)
 {
@@ -705,7 +704,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, 
struct inode *inode,
                if (!(entry->action & actmask))
                        continue;
 
-               if (!ima_match_rules(entry, mnt_userns, inode, cred, secid,
+               if (!ima_match_rules(entry, mnt_userns, inode, cred, blob,
                                     func, mask, func_data))
                        continue;
 
-- 
2.31.1

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to