On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:45 PM Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the detailed notes on this investigation. It really is a lot of > good information backing this up. However, there will come a day when someone > sees this "major = ctx->major" and they will send a patch to "fix" this > unnecessary assignment. If you are sending a V2 of this set, I would suggest > adding some comment in the code that this is for a performance improvement > and to see the commit message for additional info.
Please do not send a v2 with the changes Steve is suggesting, I think this patch is fine as-is. -- paul-moore.com -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
