On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Mark Hills wrote:
> When building bcache as a module, the following errors are silenced
> by this patch:
>
> ERROR: "call_rwsem_down_read_failed" [block/bcache.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "call_rwsem_wake" [block/bcache.ko] undefined!
>
> There may be implications of the extra code introduced by this, but
> I am not familiar with these functions. Though I can confirm that
> the resulting build seems to work.
Yeah, lockdep is going to complain loudly about that. The reason for the
__ versions is we release the lock in a different thread than we acquire
it in. There used to be down_read_non_owner() and up_read_non_owner(),
but those went away... I'll have to investigate further.
> ---
> block/bcache.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bcache.c b/block/bcache.c
> index a2dbd1e..faaf75e 100644
> --- a/block/bcache.c
> +++ b/block/bcache.c
> @@ -5561,7 +5561,7 @@ static void bio_complete(struct closure *cl)
> keylist_free(&s->op.keys);
>
> if (s->op.insert_type & INSERT_WRITE)
> - __up_read(&d->writeback_lock);
> + up_read(&d->writeback_lock);
>
> if (s->cache_bio) {
> int i;
> @@ -5911,7 +5911,7 @@ static void request_write(struct search *s)
> s->cl.fn = bio_complete;
> s->op.insert_type = INSERT_WRITE;
> check_should_skip(s);
> - __down_read(&s->op.d->writeback_lock);
> + down_read(&s->op.d->writeback_lock);
>
> if (in_writeback(s->op.d, bio->bi_sector, bio_sectors(bio))) {
> s->skip = false;
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
