On Thu, Oct 18 2012 at 9:14pm -0400, Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:08:34PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > Since last time - split bio integrity stuff out into its own 2 patch series. > > > > Also changed bio_advance() a bit - it now explicitly special cases discard > > and > > WRITE_SAME requests, so that partial completions will work. Previously, > > partial > > completions worked for other requests but would've silently blown up for > > those > > - this'll be of use later too, for generic bio splitting. > > > > I've got 3 patch series queued up but they all should be independent - git > > tree > > is at > > > > http://evilpiepirate.org/git/linux-bcache.git for-jens > > > > It's on top of jens' for-next branch. > > Your patch series posting is messed up somehow. I'm gonna review from > the git branch and post comments here but you'll probably have to post > them again. Kent's threading was definitely messed up in this wave. But threading aside, I think all the posted patches are what he intended. Looks like the "3 patch series" mentioned above map to: [PATCH v2 00/26] Prep work for immutable bio vecs [PATCH v4 00/24] Prep work for immutable bio vecs [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Fix a buffer overrun in bio_integrity_split() So you can key off of "v2 xx/26" vs "v4 xx/24" vs "v4 x/2" But, yeah, not ideal.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
