On 03/31/2014 05:20 AM, Peter Kieser wrote: > > On 2014-03-30 3:53 AM, Francis Moreau wrote: >> That's just sad to see how unstable was/is bcache sub system and I still >> don't understand why it was not marked as experimental. > > IMO, It should still be marked as experimental. Possibly, even removed > from mainline as the maintainer is not particularly responsive to major > bugs. Certainly not production ready and it's been through many releases > of the kernel now.
Well, removing from mainline is quite extreme but moving it to the staging stuff would be a possible alternative. And it should definitely be marked experimental in stable trees such as 3.12 (LTS kernel) IMHO. Specially since those trees don't get any fixes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
