Hi Michal, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test ERROR on tip/sched/core brauner-vfs/vfs.all linus/master v6.11-rc5] [cannot apply to next-20240826] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michal-Hocko/bcachefs-do-not-use-PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM/20240826-171013 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826085347.1152675-2-mhocko%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM config: arc-randconfig-001-20240827 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270304.auphm0xo-...@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240827/202408270304.auphm0xo-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408270304.auphm0xo-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/bcachefs/fs.c: In function '__bch2_new_inode': >> fs/bcachefs/fs.c:248:70: error: macro "unlikely" passed 2 arguments, but >> takes just 1 248 | if (unlikely(inode_init_always_gfp(c->vfs_sb, &inode->v), gfp)) { | ^ In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5, from include/linux/container_of.h:5, from include/linux/list.h:5, from include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h:5, from fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:186, from fs/bcachefs/fs.c:4: include/linux/compiler.h:77: note: macro "unlikely" defined here 77 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) | >> fs/bcachefs/fs.c:248:13: error: 'unlikely' undeclared (first use in this >> function) 248 | if (unlikely(inode_init_always_gfp(c->vfs_sb, &inode->v), gfp)) { | ^~~~~~~~ fs/bcachefs/fs.c:248:13: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in fs/bcachefs/fs.c: In function 'bch2_new_inode': >> fs/bcachefs/fs.c:261:67: error: 'GFP_NOWARN' undeclared (first use in this >> function); did you mean 'GFP_NOWAIT'? 261 | struct bch_inode_info *inode = __bch2_new_inode(trans->c, GFP_NOWARN | GFP_NOWAIT); | ^~~~~~~~~~ | GFP_NOWAIT vim +/unlikely +248 fs/bcachefs/fs.c 233 234 static struct bch_inode_info *__bch2_new_inode(struct bch_fs *c, gfp_t gfp) 235 { 236 struct bch_inode_info *inode = kmem_cache_alloc(bch2_inode_cache, gfp); 237 if (!inode) 238 return NULL; 239 240 inode_init_once(&inode->v); 241 mutex_init(&inode->ei_update_lock); 242 two_state_lock_init(&inode->ei_pagecache_lock); 243 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->ei_vfs_inode_list); 244 inode->ei_flags = 0; 245 mutex_init(&inode->ei_quota_lock); 246 memset(&inode->ei_devs_need_flush, 0, sizeof(inode->ei_devs_need_flush)); 247 > 248 if (unlikely(inode_init_always_gfp(c->vfs_sb, &inode->v), gfp)) > { 249 kmem_cache_free(bch2_inode_cache, inode); 250 return NULL; 251 } 252 253 return inode; 254 } 255 256 /* 257 * Allocate a new inode, dropping/retaking btree locks if necessary: 258 */ 259 static struct bch_inode_info *bch2_new_inode(struct btree_trans *trans) 260 { > 261 struct bch_inode_info *inode = __bch2_new_inode(trans->c, > GFP_NOWARN | GFP_NOWAIT); 262 263 if (unlikely(!inode)) { 264 int ret = drop_locks_do(trans, (inode = __bch2_new_inode(trans->c, GFP_NOFS)) ? 0 : -ENOMEM); 265 if (ret && inode) { 266 __destroy_inode(&inode->v); 267 kmem_cache_free(bch2_inode_cache, inode); 268 } 269 if (ret) 270 return ERR_PTR(ret); 271 } 272 273 return inode; 274 } 275 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
