On 21 08:04:03, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > Also after gcc 15 is released I don't think a version check for gcc > > should be necessary. I only see an explicit version check as required > > when we know a certain version is broken. Otherwise I would prefer using > > the build test. > > Yeah, build tests are nice, although they require spawning a process > and so on, which (as far as I understand) we try to minimize. Version > checks also have the advantage that it is easy to remember/check when > we can remove the checks themselves when we upgrade the minimum > versions. >
If the goal is to minimize the need for build tests, I think we should go with Nathan's suggestion of keeping the build test for now (to support pre-release gcc versions) and remove it and just go with versions checks for both gcc and clang once gcc 15 is released. Best Regards Jan
