On 2025/5/31 23:03, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 10:00:55PM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote:
在 2025/5/31 7:16, Kent Overstreet 写道:
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:19:32PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi!
Summary: I am curious why "ls -l" reports 16 EiB as the size of a
directory entry. As to what I can see the filesystem is perfectly fine.
Kernel 6.15, self compiled. 320 GiB BCacheFS on LUKS encrypted LVM.
Checksums are xxhash. Filesystem was created recently on self compiled
6.15-rc7 with self-compiled bcachefs tools from git tag 1.25.2. "bcachefs"
reports 1.25.1 as version number.
I have a directory entry that according to ls -l is quite big:
drwxrwxr-x 5 martin martin 18446744073709551400 DATE DIRECTORY
Yes, this is due to a leftover from the directory i_size patchset that
had to be reverted. As long as it's not causing issues it'll be a bit
before I get to it, I've got higher priority bugs I'm working on right
now (as usual).
Hongbo, whatever happened to that patchset? I thought you were going to
fix it so we could get it back in later?
I'm very sorry for the directory i_size problem. And this work has been
postponed recently due to my other internal works. Yeah, I will get back to
this work after this Dragon Boat festival. I'm really sorry I haven't dealt
with it sooner.
Ok, don't worry about it, the rest of it isn't urgent, just the i_size
fixes for the revert - I'll try to get that out today.
Hi, Kent,
Thank you, I noticed you have reverted the related patch. I've been to
busy with some internal matters recently, but I will continue to follow
up on this task.
Thanks,
Hongbo
