On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 02:16:35AM +0800, Alan Huang wrote: > ITER_UBUF is also one of the user backed iter, which is equivalent > of single-segment iovec. DIO handling should use user_backed_iter.
Applied... > > Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <[email protected]> > --- > > V2: imporve commit message > > > fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c b/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c > index 1f5154d9676b..6fdc477c81af 100644 > --- a/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c > +++ b/fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int bch2_direct_IO_read(struct kiocb *req, struct > iov_iter *iter) > * the dirtying of requests that are internal from the kernel (i.e. from > * loopback), because we'll deadlock on page_lock. > */ > - dio->should_dirty = iter_is_iovec(iter); > + dio->should_dirty = user_backed_iter(iter); > > blk_start_plug(&plug); > > -- > 2.48.1 >
